The Jukes and Kallikaks

Have you ever heard of the Jukes and the Kallikaks?  I jokingly used the phrase recently, but the listener had no idea what I was talking about.  As I remember, we were taught about them in high school, Miss Straley’s social studies class, to be exact.

Both “Jukes” and “Kallikaks” are pseudonyms for families whose genetics were studied at the end of the 19th century. The Jukes illustrated the inheritance of criminality and the Kallikaks of feeble-mindedness (“feeble-minded” was the catch-all phrase used in those days for various forms of mental retardation and learning disabilities).

The study of the Kallikaks, a family from the nearby Vineland, NJ, area (not surprising if you know Vineland), was the most famous and was published in 1912.  The fictitious name “Kallikak” was derived by combining the Greek words for good and bad.  A Revolutionary War officer on his way home to Boston had a dalliance with a feeble-minded South Jersey barmaid and then continued home where he married a society woman and began his official family that eventually produced many illustrious doctors, ministers, and civic leaders. The dalliance with the barmaid, however, produced a child whose descendents contained a long list of mental defectives that had to be institutionalized.  The studies were well known enough that the phrase “Jukes and Kallikaks” was used to refer to inbred rural families, such as those depicted in the creepy movie “Deliverance” that starred Burt Reynolds as the leader of a group of city friends on a hunting trip in Appalachia.

Of course the phrase and even the studies are now way, way, politically incorrect, but if no one remembers the reference, no one is offended.

About Roger Walck

My reasons for writing this blog are spelled out in the posting of 10/1/2012, Montaigne's Essays. They are probably not what you think.
This entry was posted in History and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Jukes and Kallikaks

  1. Telling It Like It Is 2007 says:

    Some of us out here still remember what Jukes and Kallikaks refers to and the earlier studies done. Ironically the original studies on the “Jukes” came to the conclusion that the criminality and poverty weren’t really genetic in origin but were more sociological in nature and that was really the cause of the intergenerational poverty and criminality and lack of education. But the eugenicists of the late 1800’s and early 1900’s took what they wanted out of these studies. Modern day researchers have managed to track down the actual people who were involved in the original “Jukes” study. The original male ancestor was actually a man of Dutch descent who was a tavern-keeper in upstate New York in the late 1700’s or early 1800’s and who by description of his contemporaries was not really a bad fellow but not a paragon of virtue either, and who in his younger days liked to “sow his wild oats” if you know what I mean. The progeny of that according to the study turned out to be the group of people who were supposedly of lesser intelligence and prone to criminality and scamming to get by.

    • domoreee says:

      Unfortunately, Hitler and the Nazi Party used studies such as this one as a basis for their various sterilization and extermination programs. It’s true – look it up.

      • Telling It Like It Is 2007 says:

        American advocates of eugenics such as Margaret Sanger used these studies also. Sanger, an icon of the modern Women’s Movement, and a founder of Planned Parenthood, in the 1920’s advocated forced sterilization of “the feeble minded” and groups of people that were deemed to be “social misfits”. Hitler actually borrowed many of Sangers ideas and conclusions and adopted them.

  2. Telling It Like It Is 2007 says:

    Here’s a link on the Jukes study done by Dugsdale in the 1800’s along with details such as the actual family name etc

  3. Truth Seeker says:

    Just because Adolf Hitler twisted and misrepresented an idea doesn’t mean it’s entirely false. That is logically fallacious. There actually IS some amount of truth to this. When people rant so hard to “discredit” something, I automatically become suspicious. Sort of like “nothing here to look at folks, lets move along now”. Ignorant hillbilly-ish white people who don’t really contribute anything to society and live in willful and deliberate ignorance, pumping out illegitimate babies right and left, doing “hillbilly heroin” (meth), and spreading this mindset to their whelped offspring are out there in great numbers in America today. The descendants of the Jukes and Kallikaks are alive and well in America today. This is not abstract thinking. My ex-wife was the illiegitimate offspring of her birth mother and a mysterious guy from West Virginia named John Cales. I won’t go into details, but trust me, like I said, the Jukes and Kallikaks descendants (a proper term for them, as opposed to ascendant) are still with us today.

  4. Red Flashlight says:

    The Jukesband the Kallikaks are now firmly known to be fictional.

    • Telling It Like It Is 2007 says:

      They aren’t fictional – they are actual people who’s names were disguised. The original man’s name was Keyser, who like I wrote earlier was of Dutch descent back not long after NY was a Dutch colony. Keyser was a tavern owner in upstate NY near the Hudson River. He had children and many of these children & descendants ended up being criminals and societal misfits. Dugdale’s book actually came to the conclusion that most intergenerational poverty and criminality was due to the culture and lack of education. But this was ignored by the eugenicists of the early 1900’s.

  5. a Fscking ugly hunchback, weary of life says:

    I would have been glad if I was spared my life, my ugly, hunchbacked, loser life, being part of the bottom of society, hated and despised since childhood. What is the point of this horrific existence? The tediousness, the blandness, the idiocy — and all this experienced as an ugly, mentally ill, hunchbacked piece of shit. Brilliant. No, I would not want to have myself as a father, and I would not never pass on my crappy genes on some other poor soul. After all, if I had not been born, I could not care, it’s not as if I was stuck in nothingness and have been rescued from it. There was no need to, and the source of our existence is awful anyway (see Schopenhauer’s take on the sexual act); it’s a blind, animalistic drive that I as a Christian should not indulge in anyway.

    I will quote the great Colombian Catholic Nicolás Gómez Dávila:

    Geneva, the Geneva that Calvin reigns from his sickbed, the Geneva whose shadow extends from the pulpit of Knox to the hallways of the Vatican, the Geneva where a world was formed, had about 12.000 inhabitants in 1560.
    The huge modern human masses are not only a problem, but superfluous.

    Eugenics appals those who fear its judgment.

    No beneficiary of slaves is supporter of birth control.

    Depopulate and reforest — first civilizing rule.

    Marx may win battles, but Malthus will win the war.

    The two most pressing problems of the contemporary world: demographic expansion and genetic deterioration are unsolvable.
    Liberal principles prevent the solution of the first, egalitarian ones that of the second.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.